Controversy has erupted following statements from Moses Kuria, a prominent political figure, who has accused the government of targeting the Kikuyu community with discriminatory actions. Kuria’s allegations center around recent developments involving Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua and the imminent demolition of Gikomba Market, a key economic hub for many Kikuyus in Nairobi.
In a strongly worded statement, Kuria said, “This government has started harassing Kikuyus. They started with Rigathi, now I hear tomorrow they want to demolish Gikomba Market, the main source of income for Kikuyus in Nairobi! It’s crystal clear Kikuyus are no longer wanted in this government; we were just used as voting robots!”
The impending demolition of Gikomba Market has sparked widespread concern among traders and community members who rely on the market for their livelihoods. The market is not only a commercial center but also a cultural and social gathering point for the Kikuyu community in Nairobi.
Government officials have not yet commented on the specific allegations made by Kuria. However, sources within the administration have indicated that the demolition plans are part of a broader urban redevelopment initiative aimed at modernizing infrastructure and improving safety standards in crowded markets across the city.
Despite these assurances, Kuria and his supporters view the move as a direct attack on the Kikuyu community. “The sequence of events is too coordinated to be a coincidence,” Kuria added. “This is an orchestrated effort to undermine and displace the Kikuyu people from their economic strongholds.”
The situation has drawn attention from various civil society organizations and political analysts who warn that such actions could exacerbate ethnic tensions in the country. The Kikuyu community, one of Kenya’s largest ethnic groups, has played a significant role in the nation’s politics and economy, making any perceived marginalization a sensitive and potentially volatile issue.
In response to Kuria’s remarks, some government supporters argue that the accusations are politically motivated and aimed at undermining ongoing reform efforts. They assert that the government’s actions are intended to benefit the broader public by addressing long-standing infrastructural issues that have been neglected for decades.
As the debate intensifies, the future of Gikomba Market remains uncertain. Traders and residents are anxiously awaiting further announcements from the government while rallying support to protect their livelihoods. The outcome of this situation will likely have significant implications for the relationship between the Kikuyu community and the current administration, shaping the political landscape in the months ahead.
